Questions about SOGI 123, Land Acknowledgements, Disabilities

1. Are you in favour or against SOGI 123?

There are many resources that might be helpful tools for teachers, particularly when situations involving sexual orientation or gender identity arise in the classroom. I support teacher autonomy and know that teachers work hard to select resources appropriate for their students and learning objectives.

At the same time, some parents consider sexual orientation and gender identity to be topics related to human sexuality. AP211 identifies human sexuality as a sensitive topic, and I believe the district should respect parents who would appreciate knowing when these topics are being addressed in the classroom.

This is not about limiting discussion or excluding anyone. It is about transparency and building trust with families, while giving parents an opportunity to understand and discuss important topics with their children in a way that reflects their age, maturity and family context. I believe openness and respectful dialogue are the best ways to reduce division and strengthen relationships between schools and families.

2. Do you support or are against land acknowledgements in schools?

I understand that land acknowledgements are meaningful to many, and I respect their role in recognizing Indigenous history, culture and rights. I believe they are most meaningful when they are personal, authentic and reflect the person or organization delivering them, rather than being mandated or becoming a routine or perfunctory exercise.

Our schools have an important opportunity to help students understand our history while also looking forward and building stronger relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people. I support approaches that bring people together, focus on what we share, and create meaningful opportunities for all students and communities to thrive.

3. If elected, will you commit to keeping the term disability in schools when referring to disabled students?

I would be happy to support accurate and respectful terminology in our district. We sometimes group different communities into one category, which can overlook their unique needs and experiences. Clear, accurate language matters, and the people most affected should have a meaningful voice in how they are represented. Nothing about people should be decided without listening to the people it affects.